- Joined
- Jan 31, 2013
- Posts
- 9,505
- First Name
- Terry
hi terry. Lovely pen, photos taken on a lovely camera. i'm no expert with a camera so am in no position to pass judgment. they look fine to me. my father was most particular when it came to taking photos. the first time he took me out he made me take two 36 exposure films of the same subject using a set of different apertures and exposures every 2 hours from daybreak to sunset. i learn't a lot from those pictures -one thing that suprised me was the variation in light quality (day light) through the day with the best light being in the early morning and the late afternoon (as a general rule - weather constant). he also made me take another set in doors in different rooms to investigate the light from different light sources florescent, normal light bulbs of vairying wattages etc. the results of these were also intresting and most pictures appeared lifeless and tinted to a greater or lesser degree yellow. if i remember his explanation correctly, it was to do with the temperature of the light source and the different wavelengths of light given off. by far the best pictures taken were in natural light. if i can, i try and take my photos in daylight even now (some forty years after this advice was given). if this isn't possible i'm never happy with the results..i take my hat off to those that can produce good results inside using flash photography. even with a diffuser and bouncing flash of ceilings and walls my results are inconsistant. i've often wondered about buying a slave unit to supplement my standard flash but never taken this further. the other item of kit i was advised to buy was a light tent. this again is still on my wish list. i think others in the forum have experience in these areas and i look forward to their input on this subject. In the meantime good luck with the camera and experiment to find out what suits your subject best. at least now you dont have to pay for the film to be developed and the results are instantaneous. cheers andrew
nce
Thanks Andrew. I think there is an analogy between singing live and photography. In the old days a singer got on stage and had to sing in key and a photographer had to know his art.
Nowadays a singer just has to look good and auto tuning does the rest and in photography you use a bit of software like photoshop and that does it for you. Except for me of course. I am sure Peter (Penpal) being an old time photographer could relate to this. LOL