I agree with most of what you say, but if you look at what sparked this, it was a light hearted comment from Lainey "make sure I do a good job ! ( or learn how to photoshop !)" if you turn poorly and expect to use photoshop to disguise your pour turning then you may as well learn how to turn properly. There are lots of people who use photoshop, but if you look closely at their photos you would see that they would do better to start from the beginning and learn only the basics of photography, if they learn the basics they won't need photoshop for everyday good images.
I couldn't care less if someone posts out of focus shot of their prize pens or posts photos so small it disguises the poor turning, if I can't see them and others can't see them, that's their problem.
You say "When editing the photo to our standard all you need is to crop, change the levels and maybe but rarely do any touching up." it depends what you mean by "our standard" the standard as far as I can see ranges or rather ranged from Vic's former photos to Jim's and Terry's. the thing that separates Jim's and Terry's from Vic's old pics is that they take some care with the exposure and probably need the minimum amount of photoshop, get the lighting and exposure right and you are almost there.
If you look at your photos they are for the most part sharp enough, but no matter how good you are at photoshop or any editing program they are just not on par with Jim's, Terry's and Vic's last pen photo. I remember you having a go at the advice or tips I gave on photographing pens as too technical, that's why I don't do it in public any more, but you are doing nobody any favours by saying "our standard" If pen turners want to sell their pens then the better they can photograph their pens the more likely they are to sell them. The same pen well photographed will outsell the same pen poorly photographed and I am not talking professionally well photographed.
I don't mean to cause offence with this post, but you will take it how you will.
Peter